Last week the
European Central Bank published the letter it sent on August 5, 2011 to the
then Prime Minister of Spain, Mr Zapatero. That was at a time of intense crisis
in the Eurozone. Many thought that the Eurozone would implode.
The ECB’s
letter to the Spanish government is not the only one the ECB sent to Member
States' governments. A similar letter was sent to the Italian Government. The
letter is of great significance because it reflects the ambition of the central
bank to determine macroeconomic policies in the Eurozone. This ambition should
be checked, for two reasons.
First, the
letter illustrates the intensity of the micro-economic
management the ECB intends to apply in crisis countries. The letter contains a
detailed list of what according to the ECB needs to be done in the labor
market. Thus, collective agreements should be abolished and should be organized
at the level of the individual firms. In addition, these agreements should not
contain indexation clauses, even when these are entered into freely. Two things
stand out here. First, there is the detail of the measures that the ECB would like
to impose. In doing so, it substitutes itself to national governments in the
formulation of national economic policies.
Second, it is
striking to find that these policy prescriptions are based on an economic
theory for which there is actually no serious empirical evidence. On the
contrary, there is a strong empirical research suggesting that the degree of
decentralization of wage bargaining should not go too far. The consensus among
economists is that wage bargaining at the level of individual companies harms the
economy, because it can easily give rise to a wage-price spiral when an
external shock such as an oil price increase occurs. Yet extreme decentralisation
of wage bargaining is what the ECB wants to impose in member-countries of the
Eurozone. The policy that the ECB seeks to impose is not based on evidence but
on ideology.
The second
reason why the ECB’s ambitions in setting the policy agenda in the Eurozone
must be checked has to do with governance. The ECB is a public institution,
which has been given a strong status of political independence. The latter
implies that politicians should abstain from interfering in monetary policy.
They should certainly not give instructions to the central bank on how to
conduct monetary policy. The reverse, however, is equally true. The political
independence of the ECB can only be safeguarded if that institution keeps itself
aloof from the political process and abstains from giving instructions to
governments about how economic policies should be conducted. The ECB sins
against this principle. In doing so, she puts her own independence at stake.
The ECB has
set itself the target of keeping inflation close to 2%. It is failing
spectacularly in reaching that objective and as a result, creates a risk of
deflation that today increases the debt burden of national governments. An
institution that fails to achieve its own objectives cannot afford to impose
its ideas on national governments, lest these governments will turn themselves
against the ECB.
The
instructions the ECB gives in its letter to the Spanish government lead to an
even more fundamental governance problem. The ECB consists of civil servants
who bear no political cost of the decisions they try to impose on national
governments. The latter bear the full political costs of these decisions. They
risk to be thrown out of office when they implement policies forced upon them
by the ECB. The civil servants of the ECB go home unharmed. This is a
governance structure that is unsustainable and that will be rejected. It is
important that the ECB realises this and reduces its ambition to rule the
politicians. Failure to do so will greatly harm the ECB.